網站首頁 個人文檔 個人總結 工作總結 述職報告 心得體會 演講稿 講話致辭 實用文 教學資源 企業文化 公文 論文

英文演講稿開場白(精選多篇)

欄目: 演講稿精選 / 發佈於: / 人氣:2.49W

第一篇:英文演講稿開場白

英文演講稿開場白(精選多篇)

opening statement

mr. chairman, senator thurmond, members of the committee, my name is anita f. hill, and i am a professor of law at the university of oklahoma. i was born on a farm in okmulgee county, oklahoma, in 1956. i am the youngest of 13 children. i had my early education in okmulgee county. my father, albert hill, is a farmer in that area. my mother's name is irma hill. she is also a farmer and a housewife.

my childhood was one of a lot of hard work and not much money, but it was one of solid family affection, as represented by my parents. i was reared in a religious atmosphere in the baptist faith, and i have been a member of the antioch baptist church in tulsa, oklahoma, since 1983. it is a very warm part of my life at the present time.

for my undergraduate work, i went to oklahoma state university and graduated from there in 1977. i am attaching to this statement a copy of my resume for further details of my education.

i graduated from the university with academic honors and proceeded to the yale law school, where i received my jd degree in 1980. upon graduation from law school, i became a practicing lawyer with the washington, dc, firm of ward, hardraker, and ross.

in 1981, i was introduced to now judge thomas by a mutual friend. judge thomas told me that he was anticipating a political appointment, and he asked if i would be interested in working with him. he was, in fact, appointed as assistant secretary of education for civil rights. after he had taken that post, he asked if i would become his assistant, and i accepted that position.

in my early period there, i had two major projects. the first was an article i wrote for judge thomas' signature on the education of minority students. the second was the organization of a seminar on high-risk students which was abandoned because judge thomas transferred to the eeoc where he became the chairman of that office.

during this period at the department of education, my working relationship with judge thomas was positive. i had a good deal of responsibility and independence. i thought he respected my work and that he trusted my judgment. after approximately three months of working there, he asked me to go out socially with him.

what happened next and telling the world about it are the two most difficult things -- experiences of my life. it is only after a great deal of agonizing consideration and sleeplenumber -- a great number of sleeplenights tha(t i amable to talk of these unpleasant matters to anyone but my close friends.

i declined the invitation to go out socially with him and explained to him that i thought it would jeopardize what at the time i considered to be a very good working relationship. i had a normal social life with other men outside of the office. i believed then, as now, that having a social relationship with a person who was supervising my work would be ill-advised. i was very uncomfortable with the idea and told him so.

i thought that by saying no and explaining my reasons my employer would abandon his social suggestions. however, to my regret, in the following few weeks, he continued to ask me out on several occasions. he pressed me to justify my reasons for saying no to him. these incidents took place in his office or mine. they were in the form of private conversations which would not have been overheard by anyone else.

my working relationship became even more strained when judge thomas began to use work situations to discuse-x. on these occasions, he would call me into his office for reports on education issues and projects, or he might suggest that, because of the time pressures of his schedule, we go to lunch to a government cafeteria. after a brief discussion of work, he would turn the conversation to a discussion of se-xual matters.

his conversations were very vivid. he spoke about acts that he had seen in pornographic films involving such matters as women having se-x with animals and films showing group se-x or rape scenes. he talked about pornographic materials depicting individuals with large penises or large breasts involved in various se-x acts. on several occasions, thomas told me graphically of his own se-xual prowess.

because i was extremely uncomfortable talking about se-x with him at all and particularly in such a graphic way, i told him that i did not want to talk about these subjects. i would also try to change the subject to education matters or to nonse-xual personal matters such as his background or his beliefs. my efforts to change the subject were rarely successful.

throughout the period of these conversations, he also from time to time asked me for social engagements. my reaction to these conversations was to avoid them by eliminating opportunities for us to engage in extended conversations. this was difficult because at the time i was his only assistant at the office of education -- or of

fice for civil rights.

第二篇:英文精彩演講稿開場白集錦

opening statement

mr. chairman, senator thurmond, members of the committee, my name is anita f. hill, and i am a professor of law at the university of oklahoma. i was born on a farm in okmulgee county, oklahoma, in 1956. i am the youngest of 13 children. i had my early education in okmulgee county. my father, albert hill, is a farmer in that area. my mother's name is irma hill. she is also a farmer and a housewife.

my childhood was one of a lot of hard work and not much money, but it was one of solid family affection, as represented by my parents. i was reared in a religious atmosphere in the baptist faith, and i have been a member of the antioch baptist church in tulsa, oklahoma, since 1983. it is a very warm part of my life at the present time.

for my undergraduate work, i went to oklahoma state university and graduated from there in 1977. i am attaching to this statement a copy of my resume for further details of my education.

i graduated from the university with academic honors and proceeded to the yale law school, where i received my jd degree in 1980. upon graduation from law school, i became a practicing lawyer with the washington, dc, firm of ward, hardraker, and ross.

in 1981, i was introduced to now judge thomas by a mutual friend. judge thomas told me that he was anticipating a political appointment, and he asked if i would be interested in working with him. he was, in fact, appointed as assistant secretary of education for civil rights. after he had taken that post, he asked if i would become his assistant, and i accepted that position.

in my early period there, i had two major projects. the first was an article i wrote for judge thomas' signature on the education of minority students. the second was the organization of a seminar on high-risk students which was abandoned because judge thomas transferred to the eeoc where he became the chairman of that office.

during this period at the department of education, my working relationship with judge thomas was positive. i had a good deal of responsibility and independence. i thought he respected my work and that he trusted my judgment. after approximately three months of working there, he asked me to go out socially with him.

what happened next and telling the world about it are the two most difficult things -- experiences of my life. it is only after a great deal of agonizing consideration and sleepless number -- a great number of sleepless nights that i am able to talk of these unpleasant matters to anyone but my close friends.

i declined the invitation to go out socially with him and explained to him that i thought it would jeopardize what at the time i considered to be a very good working relationship. i had a normal social life with other men outside of the office. i believed then, as now, that having a social relationship with a person who was supervising my work would be ill-advised. i was very uncomfortable with the idea and told him so.

i thought that by saying no and explaining my reasons my employer would abandon his social suggestions. however, to my regret, in the following few weeks, he continued to ask me out on several occasions. he pressed me to justify my reasons for saying no to him. these incidents took place in his office or mine. they were in the form of private conversations which would not have been overheard by anyone else.

my working relationship became even more strained when judge thomas began to use work situations to discuss sex. on these occasions, he would call me into his office for reports on education issues and projects, or he might suggest that, because of the time pressures of his schedule, we go to lunch to a government cafeteria. after a brief discussion of work, he would turn the conversation to a discussion of sexual matters.

his conversations were very vivid. he spoke about acts that he had seen in pornographic films involving such matters as women having sex with animals and films showing group sex or rape scenes. he talked about pornographic materials depicting individuals with large penises or large breasts involved in various sex acts. on several occasions, thomas told me graphically of his own sexual prowess.

because i was extremely uncomfortable talking about sex with him at all and particularly in such a graphic way, i told him that i did not want to talk about these subjects. i would also try to change the subject to education matters or to nonsexual personal matters such as his background or his beliefs. my efforts to change the subject were rarely successful.

throughout the period of these conversations, he also from time to time asked me for social engagements. my reaction to these conversations was to avoid them by eliminating opportunities for us to engage in extended conversations. this was difficult because at the time i was his only assistant at the office of education -- or office for civil rights.

during the latter part of my time at the department of education, the social pressures and any conversation of his offensive behavior ended. i began both to believe and hope that our working relationship could be a proper, cordial, and professional one.

when judge thomas was made chair of the eeoc, i needed to face the question of whether to go with him. i was asked to do so, and i did. the work itself was interesting, and at that time it appeared that the sexual overtures which had so troubled me had ended. i also faced the realistic fact that i had no alternative job. while i might have gone back to private practice, perhaps in my old firm or at another, i was dedicated to civil rights work, and my first choice was to be in that field. moreover, the department of education itself was a dubious venture. president reagan was seeking to abolish the entire department.

for my first months at the eeoc, where i continued to be an assistant to judge thomas, there were no sexual conversations or overtures. however, during the fall and winter of 1982, these began again. the comments were random and ranged from pressing me about why i didn't go out with him to remarks about my personal appearance. i remember his saying that some day i would have to tell him the real reason that i wouldn't go out with him.

he began to show displeasure in his tone and voice and his demeanor and his continued pressure for an explanation. he commented on what i was wearing in terms of whether it made me more or less sexually attractive. the incidents occurred in his inner office at the eeoc.

one of the oddest episodes i remember was an occasion in which thomas was drinking a coke in his office. he got up from the table at which we were working, went over to his desk to get the coke, looked at the can and asked, "who has pubic hair on my coke?" on other occasions, he referred to the size of his own penis as being larger than normal, and he also spoke on some occasions of the pleasures he had given to women with oral sex.

at this point, late 1982, i began to feel severe stress on the job. i began to be concerned that clarence thomas might take out his anger with me by degrading me or not giving me important assignments. i also thought that he might find an excuse for dismissing me.

in january of 1983, i began looking for another job. i was handicapped because i feared that, if he found out, he might make it difficult for me to find other employment and i might be dismissed from the job i had. another factor that made my search more difficult was that there was a period -- this was during a period of a hiring freeze in the government. in february of 1983, i was hospitalized for five days on an emergency basis for acute stomach pain which i attributed to stress on the job.

once out of the hospital, i became more committed to find other employment and sought further to minimize my contact with thomas. this became easier when allison duncan (sp) became office director, because most of my work was then funneled through her and i had contact with clarence thomas mostly in staff meetings.

in the spring of 1983, an opportunity to teach at oral roberts university opened up. i participated in a seminar -- taught an afternoon session and seminar at oral roberts university. the dean of the university saw me teaching and inquired as to whether i would be interested in furthering -- pursuing a career in teaching, beginning at oral roberts university. i agreed to take the job in large part because of my desire to escape the pressures i felt at the eeoc due to judge thomas.

when i informed him that i was leaving in july, i recall that his response was that now i would no longer have an excuse for not going out with him. i told him that i still preferred not to do so. at some time after that meeting, he asked if he could take me to dinner at the end of the term. when i declined, he assured me that the dinner was a professional courtesy only and not a social invitation. i reluctantly agreed to accept that invitation, but only if it was at the every end of a working day.

on, as i recall, the last day of my employment at the eeoc in the summer of 1983, i did have dinner with clarence thomas. we went directly from work to a restaurant near the office. we talked about the work i had done, both at education and at the eeoc. he told me that he was pleased with all of it except for an article and speech that i had done for him while we were at the office for civil rights. finally, he made a comment that i will vividly remember. he said that if i ever told anyone of his behavior that it would ruin his career. this was not an apology, nor was it an explanation. that was his last remark about the possibility of our going out or reference to his behavior.

in july of 1983, i left washington, dc area and have had minimal contact

with judge clarence thomas since. i am of course aware from the press that some questions have been raised about conversations i had with judge clarence thomas after i left the eeoc. from 1983 until today, i have seen judge thomas only twice. on one occasion, i needed to get a reference from him, and on another he made a public appearance in tulsa.

on one occasion he called me at home and we had an inconsequential conversation. on one occasion he called me without reaching me, and i returned the call without reaching him, and nothing came of it. i have on at least three occasions, been asked to act as a conduit to him for others.

i knew his secretary, diane holt. we had worked together at both eeoc and education. there were occasions on which i spoke to her, and on some of these occasions undoubtedly i passed on some casual comment to then chairman thomas. there were a series of calls in the first three months of 1985, occasioned by a group in tulsa, which wished to have a civil rights conference. they wanted judge thomas to be the speaker and enlisted my assistance for this purpose.

i did call in january and february to no effect, and finally suggested to the person directly involved, susan cahal (ph) that she put the matter into her own hands and call directly. she did so in march of 1985. in connection with that march invitation, ms. cahal (ph) wanted conference materials for the seminar and some research was needed. i was asked to try to get the information and did attempted to do so.

there was another call about another possible conference in july of 1985. in august of 1987, i was in washington, dc and i did call diane holt. in the course of this conversation, she asked me how long i was going to be in town and i told her. (請你收藏好 範 文,請便下次訪問)it is recorded in the message as august 15. it was, in fact, august 20th. she told me about judge thomas's marriage and i did say congratulate him.

it is only after a great deal of agonizing consideration that i am able to talk of these unpleasant matters to anyone except my closest friends. as i've said before these last few days have been very trying and very hard for me and it hasn't just been the last few days this week. it has actually been over a month now that i have been under the strain of this issue.

telling the world is the most difficult experience of my life, but it is very close to having to live through the experience that occasion this meeting. i may have used poor judgment early on in my relationship with this issue. i was aware, however, that telling at any point in my career could adversely affect my future career. and i did not want early on to burn all the bridges to the eeoc.

as i said, i may have used poor judgment. perhaps i should have taken angry or even militant steps, both when i was in the agency, or after i left it. but i must confess to the world that the course that i took seemed the better as well as the easier approach.

i declined any comment to newspapers, but later when senate staff asked me about these matters i felt i had a duty to report. i have no personal vendetta against clarence thomas. i seek only to provide the committee with information which it may regard as relevant.

it would have been more comfortable to remain silent. i took no initiative to inform anyone. but when i was asked by a representative of this committee to report my experience, i felt that i had to tell the truth. i could not keep silent.

第三篇:英文開場白

( 1 ) 開場白

1. let me introduce myself. / let me do some introduction. 讓我來介紹一下自己。

2. which aspect do you want to know about me? 您想知道我哪方面的情況?

3. what do you want to know about myself? 您想知道我哪方面的情況?

4. good morning/afternoon/evening, my name is …… . it is really a great honor to have this opportunity/chance to introduce myself. i would like to answer whatever you may raise, and i hope i can make a good performance today.

上午好 / 下午好 / 晚上好!我的名字叫 …… 。今天有機會進行自我介紹深感榮幸。我樂 意

回答你們所提出來的任何問題。我希望我今天能表現的非常出色。

( 2 ) 關於職位、工作

1. i noticed that you advertised a job in this morning ’ s paper. 我看到你們在今早的報紙上刊登的招聘廣告。

2. i ’ m coming for your advertisement for … . 我是來應聘你們廣告上的 …… 職位的。

3. i have applied for the position of … . 我申請了貴公司的 …… 職位。

4. i haven ’ t done anything like that before. 我以前沒有做過這種工作。

5. i think i ’ m quite fit for assistant ’ s job. 我覺得我很適合做助理的工作。

6. i used to work as a sale ’ s manager. 我以前做銷售經理

7. i ’ m quite familiar with edit ing. 我做過很多編輯工作。

8. i want a job with a vacation every year. 我想找個每年都能度假的工作。

9. i was thinking of a job in a school. 我打算到學校找份工作。

10. i worked in the accounting section of a manufacturer of electrical products. 我曾在電子產品製造商的會計組工作。

11. i have been for over five years in teh employ of an exporting company. 本人曾經前後五年被受僱於出口貿易公司。

12. i have been in the business for the last ten years, and worked as the superintendent in the personnel department. 本人在過去十年在商界擔任人事部主任迄今。

13. i have had five years ‘ experience with a company as a salesman. 本人曾在某一公司擔任推銷員,前後有五年之久。

14. for the past three years, i have been in the office of the brothers trading co., where i have been ad still am an accountant. 本人曾經在兄弟貿易公司服務三年,擔任會計工作,現仍在職中。

15. i am twenty years of age, and have been employed for the last two years by the green trees co., in teh general clerical work of the office. 我今年 20 歲,曾於綠林公司服務兩年,擔任一般文員工作。

16. i am 25 years of age, and have had two years ‘ experience in my present post, which i am leaving to better myself. 我今年 25 歲,已在目前的職位工作兩年,茲為尋找更上一層樓,準備離開此職位。

17. i am nineteen years of age, female and have had two years ‘ experience in a company ‘ s delivery office. 我今年 19 歲,女性。曾在某家公司擔任收發工作兩年。

18. i am just leaving school, and am eighteen years of age. 本人 18 歲,不久即可畢業。

19. i am twenty years of age, and am anxious to settle down to office work. 本人 20 歲,希望能找到一個公司,以便安定下來。

20. since my graduation from the school two years ago, i have been employed in teh green hotel as a cashier. 兩年前,自從離校後,在格蘭酒店擔任出納員。

( 3 )關於個人基本情況

1. i am …… years old, born in …… province/beijing, northeast/southeast/southwest …… of china, and i am currently a freshman (大一新生) /sophomore (大二學生) /junior (大三學生 )

/senior (大四學生) student at capital institute of physical education.

我今年 …… 歲,出生在 …… 省 / 北京,它位於中國的東北 / 東南 / 西南 …… 等部。我目前 是

首都體育學院大一 / 大二 / 大三 / 大四的學生。

第四篇:演講稿開場白要求

一、出語驚人

如果你想迅速吸引你的聽眾,那麼在演講的開頭,你可以描繪一個異乎尋常的場面,或透露一個觸目驚心的數據,或栩栩如生地描述一個聳人聽聞的事情,造成“此言一出,舉座皆驚”的藝術效果,這樣,聽眾不僅會驀然凝神,而且還會側耳細聽,更多地尋求你的講話內容,探詢你演講的原因。

二、設置懸念

人都有好奇的天性。在開場白中製造懸念,能激發聽眾的強烈興趣和好奇心,在適當的時候解開懸念,使聽眾的好奇心得到滿足,也使演講前後照應,渾然一體。

三、巧用修辭

精彩的演講必須有精美的語言包裝,要想語言生動活潑,就要發揮修辭的作用。在意境方面,用比喻、誇張、設問、反問、借代等修辭手法,調劑語言韻味,讓聽眾聽得有趣;在形式方面,用對偶、排比等整齊的句式來增強演講的氣勢,讓聽眾聽得振奮。

第五篇:演講稿開場白

文章開頭最難寫,同樣道理,作演講開場白最不易把握,要想三言兩語抓住聽眾的心,並非易事。如果在演講的開始聽眾對你的話就不感興趣,注意力一旦被分散了,那後面再精彩的言論也將黯然失色。因此只有匠心獨運的開場白,以其新穎、奇趣、敏慧之美,才能給聽眾留下深刻印象,才能立即控制場上氣氛,在瞬間裏集中聽眾注意力,從而為接下來的演講內容順利地搭梯架橋。

奇論妙語石破天驚聽眾對平庸普通的論調都不屑一顧,置若罔聞;倘若發人未見,用別人意想不到的見解引出話題,造成“此言一出,舉座皆驚”的藝術效果,會立即震撼聽眾,使他們急不可耐地聽下去,這樣就能達到吸引聽眾的目的。

我記起了畢業歡送會上班主任給我們的致詞。他一開口就讓我們疑竇叢生——“我原來想祝福大家一帆風順,但仔細一想,這樣説不恰當。”這句話把我們弄得丈二和尚摸不着頭腦,大家屏聲靜氣地聽下去——“説人生一帆風順就如同祝某人萬壽無疆一樣,是一個美麗而又空洞的謊言。人生漫漫,必然會遇到許多艱難困苦,比如……”最後得出結論:“一帆風不順的人生才是真實的人生,在逆風險浪中拼搏的人生才是最輝煌的人生。祝大家奮力拼搏,在坎坷的征程中,用堅實有力的步伐走向美好的未來!”十多年過去了,班主任的話語猶在耳邊,給我留下了永難磨滅的印象。“一帆風順”是常見的吉祥祝語,而老師偏偏反彈琵琶,從另一角度悟出了人生哲理。第一句話無異於平地驚雷,又宛若異峯突起,怎能不震撼人心?

需要注意的是,運用這種方式應掌握分寸,弄不好會變為譁眾取寵,故作聳人之語。應結合聽眾心理、理解層次出奇制勝。再有,不能為了追求怪異而大發謬論、怪論,也不能生硬牽扯,胡亂昇華。否則,極易引起聽眾的反感和厭倦。須知,無論多麼新鮮的認識始終是建立在正確的主旨之上的。

自嘲開路幽默搭橋自嘲就是“自我開炮”,用在開場白裏,目的是用詼諧的語言巧妙地自我介紹,這樣會使聽眾倍感親切,無形中縮短了與聽眾間的距離。在第四次作代會上,蕭軍應邀上台,第一句話就是:“我叫蕭軍,是一個出土文物。”這句話包含了多少複雜感情:有辛酸,有無奈,有自豪,有幸福。而以自嘲之語表達,形式異常簡潔,內藴尤其豐富!胡適在一次演講時這樣開頭:“我今天不是來向諸君作報告的,我是來‘胡説’的,因為我姓胡。”話音剛落,聽眾大笑。這個開場白既巧妙地介紹了自己,又體現了演講者謙遜的修養,而且活躍了場上氣氛,溝通了演講者與聽眾的心理,一石三鳥,堪稱一絕。

1990年中央電視台邀請台灣影視藝術家凌峯先生參加春節聯歡晚會。當時,許多觀眾對他還很陌生,可是他説完那妙不可言的開場白後,一下子被觀眾認同並受到了熱烈歡迎。他説:“在下凌峯,我和文章不同,雖然我們都獲得過‘金鐘獎’和最佳男歌星稱號,但我以長得難看而出名……一般來説,女觀眾對我的印象不太好,她們認為我是人比黃花瘦,臉比煤炭黑。”這一番話嬉而不謔,妙趣橫生,觀眾捧腹大笑。這段開場白給人們留下了非常坦誠、風趣幽默的良好印象。不久,在“金話筒之夜”文藝晚會上,只見他滿臉含笑,對觀眾説:“很高興又見到了你們,很不幸又見到了我。”觀眾報以熱烈的掌聲。至此,凌峯的名字就傳遍了祖國大地。